AndresIgnacio/LiciCariola
Updated
judgement stringlengths 593 62.4k | summary stringlengths 0 13.8k | legal_summaries stringlengths 358 3.49k |
|---|---|---|
Appeal No.1539 of 1971.
(From the Judgment and Order dated 5 8 1969 of the Allahabad High Court in Special Appeal No. 58/65).
B.B. Ahuja and R.N. Sachthey, for the Appellant.
A.T.M. Sampath and Ram Lal, for Respondent No. 1. 215 The Judgment of the Court was delivered by SARKARIA, J.
This appeal on certificate is direc... | Since the assessee had not maintained complete and regular accounts for the purpose of Excess Profits tax, the Excess Profits Tax Officer assessed tax on the basis of accounts of certain previous years chosen by the assessee as his "standard period", pointing out that because of this position it was not possible to mak... | **Court Case Summary**
The Allahabad High Court's judgment in Special Appeal No. 58/65 was challenged in Appeal No. 1539 of 1971. The case involved M/s. S.B. Singar Singh and Sons, an assessee who was assessed to Excess Profits Tax for the chargeable accounting periods ending March 31, 1945 and March 31, 1946. The ass... |
vil Appeal No. 291 of 1955.
Appeal by special leave from the judgment and order dated March 29, 1955, of the Calcutta High Court in appeal from Appellate Order No. 134 of 1954, affirming the appeal against the judgment and order 361 dated July 29, 1954, of the Court of the District Judge of 24 Parganas in Misc.
Appeal ... | Respondent obtained a decree for ejectment against the appellant, a thika tenant, and filed an application for execution of the decree before the civil Court.
Appellant resisted the application on the ground that in view Of section 5(1) Of the Calcutta Thika Tenancy Act, 1949, the civil Court had no jurisdiction to ent... | Here is a two-paragraph summary of the court case:
The appellant, a thika tenant, appealed to the Supreme Court after his execution petition was dismissed by the Calcutta High Court. The issue at hand was whether the civil courts had the jurisdiction to entertain the execution petition filed by the respondent against ... |
s (Nos. 513, 566, 568, 570, 591,595, 596, 601, 616, 617, 623, 625, 631 and 632 of 1951) under article 32 of the Constitution for writs in the nature of habeas corpus.
The facts are stated in the judg ment.
Raghbir Singh (amicus curiae) for the petitioners in Petitions Nos.
513, 566, 568, 570.
595, 596, 609, 616, 617, 6... | In the absence of bad faith the detaining authority can supersede an earlier order of detention which has been challenged as defective on merely formal grounds and make a fresh order wherever possible which is free from defects and duly complies with the requirements of the law in that behalf.
The question of bad faith... | Here's a two-paragraph summary of the court case:
The case revolves around the preventive detention of Naranjan Singh Nathawan by the State of Punjab under the Preventive Detention Act, 1950. Singh was arrested on July 5, 1950, and detained under an order of the District Magistrate of Amritsar, citing grounds that wer... |
Appeal No. 395 of 1959.
Appeal by special leave from the Award dated November 25, 1957 of the Industrial Tribunal, Bombay, in Reference (I. T.) No. 24 of 1956.
N. C. Chatterjee, D. H. Buch and K. L. Hathi, for the appellants.
M. C. Setalvad, Attorney General for India, J. B. Dadachanji and section N. Andley, for the re... | Section 20(1) of the (XXVII of 1953), read with the proviso, is a perfectly reasonable provision and in the interest of the employees and it is not correct to say that it can apply only to the direct recruits of the existing air 812 companies and not at all to loaned employees working under them.
The two conditions of ... | **Legal Summary of Court Case**
This is an appeal by special leave in an industrial matter, where the appellants were originally in the service of the Scindia Steam Navigation Co. Ltd. and were transferred to the Air Services of India Limited (ASI) on loan. The ASI was later taken over by the Indian Air Lines Corporat... |
Appeals Nos. 195 and 196 of 1959.
Appeals by special leave from the Award dated April 15, 1957, of the Third Industrial Tribunal, West Bengal, in Case No. VIII 7 of 1956.
B. Sen, P. K. Chakravarty and B. N. Ghosh, for the appellants (in C. A. No. 195 of 59) and respondents (in C. A. No. 196 of 59).
N. C. Chatterjee, D.... | There can be no doubt from the point of view of Economics that the clerical and subordinate staff of an industry like its manual workers contribute to its production and there can, therefore, be no reason for excluding them wholly from the benefits of a scheme of incentive bonus.
The fact that the clerical staff are pa... | Here's a two-paragraph summary of the court case:
This court case refers to two appeals by special leave against the award of the Third Industrial Tribunal, West Bengal. The appeals were filed by Messrs. Burn and Co. Limited (the company) and the workmen of the company. The disputes between the company and the workmen... |
ivil Appeal Nos.
1186 to 201 of 1975.
Appeals by Special Leave from the Judgment and orders dated the 11th November, 1974, 6th December, 1974 and 27th November, 1974 of the Allahabad High Court in Civil Misc.
Writ Nos. 4139, 5354, 5352 5353, 5355 5357, 4065, 4912, 4326, 4212, 4218, 4545, 4328, 4543 and 4769 of 1972 res... | The appellants challenged the validity of fixation of price of levy the high Court.
During the pendency of the petitions, the appellants a stay order from the High Court for charging the price in eyes price fixed by the State on furnishing Bank guarantees for the excess price Ultimately, the High Court upheld the contr... | Here is a two-paragraph summary of the court case:
The Allahabad High Court had earlier ordered sugar millers to disgorge excess profits earned by selling sugar at higher prices during a period when the government had imposed a controlled price. The sugar millers had challenged the controlled price but secured a stay ... |
Appeal No. 147 of 1951.
Appeal from the Judgment and Decree dated September 4, 1946, of the late Chief Court of Oudh (now the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench) (Misra and Wallford JJ.) in First Civil Appeal No. 139 of 1941, arising out of the Judgment,and Decree dated October 23, 1941, of the Court ... | The Oudh Estates Act (Act I of 1869) does not interdict the creation of future estates and limitations provided they do not transgress the rule of perpetuities and where a disposition by a will made by a taluqdar does not make the legatee an absolute owner but gives him only an interest for life which is followed by su... | In the case of Appeal No. 147 of 1951, the plaintiff, Bajrang Bahadur Singh, sought to challenge the judgment and decree of the Chief Court of Oudh, which had dismissed his claim to the properties of the Gangwat Estate. The estate was inherited by Raja Bisheshwar Bux Singh, the father of the plaintiff and the husband o... |
N: Civil Appeal Nos.
1629 to 1631 of 1968.
Appeals from the judgment and order dated January 29, 1965 of the Calcutta High Court in Wealth Tax Matter No. 372 of 1961.
B. Sen, T.A. Ramachandran, R.N. Sachthey and B.D. Sharma, for the appellant (in 'all the appeals).
M.C. Chagla, R.K. Choudhury and B.P. Maheshwari, for t... | The respondent company was assessed to wealth tax for the assessment years 1957 58, 1958 59 and 1959 60.
In computing the net wealth of the respondent on the respective valuation dates the Wealth Tax Officer proceeded under section 7(2)(a) of the Act and included the full value of the fixed assets as shown by the respo... | Here's a two-paragraph summary of the court case:
The case is a civil appeal brought by a respondent company against the judgment of the Calcutta High Court dated January 29, 1965, in Wealth Tax Matter No. 372 of 1961. The company is assessed to wealth tax for the assessment years 1957-58, 1958-59, and 1959-60. The We... |
Civil Appeal No. 2050 of 1973.
Appeal by special leave from the judgment and order dated the 14th October, 1971 of the Andhra Pradesh High Court in Writ Appeal No. 691 of 1970.
B. Parthasarthi for the Appellant.
P.N. Poddar for Respondent No. 2.
section Markakandeya for Respondent No. 6.
The Judgment of the Court was d... | The appellant, an officer of the Forest Department challenged the provisional integrated gradation list of Forest Officers of the former Andhra and Hyderabad States published under the provisions of the States Reorganisation Act, 1947, in his writ petition, contending that (a) the inter se seniority between the appella... | Here's a two-paragraph summary of the court case:
The case revolves around the fixation of seniority between an officer of the Forest Department, B. Parthasarthi (appellant), and another officer, the 6th respondent, who both belonged to the Andhra Cadre. The appellant challenged the provisional integrated gradation li... |
ivil Appeal No. 3284 of 1992 From the Judgement and Order dated 18.2.1992 of the Delhi High Court in Civil Writ Petition No. 2259 of 1991.
R.K. Garg, K.L. Vohra, Rajeev Sharma and D.K. Garg for the Appellants.
Arun Jaitley, V.B. Saharya, Ashok Bhan and B.K. Prasad for the Respondents.
The Judgement of the Court was del... | During the pendency of a suit for eviction of the appellants from the property of Respondent No.1, the appellants were alleged to have trespassed beyond the area which was the subject matter of the suit and indulged in several illegal activities.
Thus according to Respondents, the appellants were guilty of mischievous ... | Here's a two-paragraph summary of the court case:
The case involves a dispute between two private individuals, the appellants (two brothers) and the respondents (a lady and her representative) over a house property in Delhi. The respondents claimed that the appellants had trespassed on the property and were guilty of ... |
End of preview. Expand in Data Studio
README.md exists but content is empty.
- Downloads last month
- 25
Models trained or fine-tuned on satviksh09/hf_legal_dataset_legal_analysis